Re: 32bit dev_t
[Posted January 22, 2003 by corbet]
| From: |
| Alan <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> |
| To: |
| Steven Dake <sdake@mvista.com> |
| Subject: |
| Re: 32bit dev_t |
| Date: |
| 21 Jan 2003 22:33:05 +0000 |
| Cc: |
| Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> |
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 21:29, Steven Dake wrote:
> Joel,
>
> Linux doesn't really need a 32 bit kdev_t structure to support 1000
> disks. There is plenty of device space available to support over 1500
> disks by modifying the linux scsi layer.
You run out of assigned major/minor numbers. There is a sick hack that
steals other device idents but thats not usable in a production environment.
32bit dev_t IMHO is essential to 2.6. Essential enough that if its not in
the base 2.6 all the vendors have to get together and issue a Linus
incompatible but common 32bit dev_t interface.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
(
Log in to post comments)