Various responses to Microsoft/Novell
Posted Nov 4, 2006 19:20 UTC (Sat) by gravious
In reply to: Various responses to Microsoft/Novell
Parent article: Various responses to Microsoft/Novell
I notice you haven't explained anywhere in your severance statement why you have made the choices you have made apart from some vague mention of risk from an unspecified source. Is this a normal practice of yours? Do you also snub your local delicatessen when they do a deal with McDonalds but only hint at your displeasure and grievance? (Okay - I know, odious analogy.) At least give Novell the courtesy of your informed and considered opinion so that they may see the error of their ways. Or do we suddenly live in a world where people are now automatically tainted by association? Having said all that I wouldn't trust Microsoft with a proverbial ten foot barge pole but until somebody can convinglingly demonstrate to me that not only has Novell acted in bad faith towards the Open Source community and also put us all somehow in jeopardy I'm not buying any of this Evil Novell crud. Clause 7 or no clause 7.
to post comments)