| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Bruce Peren's takeBruce Peren's takePosted Nov 3, 2006 17:23 UTC (Fri) by ghelmling (guest, #4140)In reply to: Bruce Peren's take by jsarets Parent article: Various responses to Microsoft/Novell
Which really raises the question of what the value of this is to Novell and why they even entered into this agreement?
Doesn't this essentially give Microsoft a "remote kill" switch over Novell's Linux business? All they have to do is file a patent infringement lawsuit against anyone for using the Linux kernel and they put Novell in violation of the GPL...
(Log in to post comments)
Just like Sun. Posted Nov 3, 2006 17:49 UTC (Fri) by NZheretic (guest, #409) [Link] April 6, 2004 Did Sun Have to to Choose "Between Shame and War"?April 14, 2004 A 'Very Good Thing' for whom? Microsoft's MCPP November 29,2004 The conflict between MCPP and Open Source Finally Sun's James Gosling on February 3, 2005 Java creator questions Sun/Microsoft pact.
|
|
||||||||||||