| |||||||||||||
Oracle Isn't a Linux Company (Motley Fool)Oracle Isn't a Linux Company (Motley Fool)Posted Oct 18, 2006 18:17 UTC (Wed) by tjc (subscriber, #137)In reply to: Oracle Isn't a Linux Company (Motley Fool) by peace Parent article: Oracle Isn't a Linux Company (Motley Fool)
Red Hat could use PostgreSQL anytime it wanted, without purchasing the company, and compete with Oracle.They already tried that with "Red Hat Database."
(Log in to post comments)
Oracle Isn't a Linux Company (Motley Fool) Posted Oct 18, 2006 18:40 UTC (Wed) by kleptog (subscriber, #1183) [Link] Redhat still employs significant PostgreSQL developers. AIUI they get to program what they like, but they're also a contact point if one of Redhat's "Enterprise" customers has a problem with their PostgreSQL database (or Redhat Database, whatever they want to call it).
|
|||||||||||||