Device drivers and non-disclosure agreements [LWN.net]

Device drivers and non-disclosure agreements

Posted Oct 12, 2006 11:22 UTC (Thu) by smitty_one_each (subscriber, #28989)
In reply to: Device drivers and non-disclosure agreements by drag
Parent article: Device drivers and non-disclosure agreements

>Hardware by definition is propriatory, there is no way around it.

This is my point: if you don't like the definition, and find it insurmountable, *then change it*.
While I wouldn't contend that it's likely that the F/OSS community can beat nVidia or ATI head-on in a graphics shoot-out, hopefully the Open-Graphics effort will culminate in something that runs 2d graphics at reasonable resolution.
I realize that some people are deeply into games, and there will always be an nVidia to push them 31337 hardware.
Others, however, see the compiler as the ultimate game...

(Log in to post comments)

Device drivers and non-disclosure agreements

Posted Oct 12, 2006 13:44 UTC (Thu) by grahammm (guest, #773) [Link]

Hardware (or rather the interface to it) does not have to be proprietary. Take UARTS for example. There are a vast number of UARTs, whether discrete or emulated in FGPA etc, or even the interfaces to GSM etc modules, which use the register interface originally used by the NatSemi 8250 - often with the 16550 FIFO extensions. Similarly up to and including VGA, the register interface to video cards was standard across manufacturers.