Kernel developers' position on GPLv3
Posted Sep 22, 2006 22:55 UTC (Fri) by smoogen
In reply to: Kernel developers' position on GPLv3
Parent article: Kernel developers' position on GPLv3
When in the past I sent in patches to FSF code, I was asked to sign over my copyright of that patch to the FSF for it to be accepted. This was listed by others I asked as the standard FSF practice. I think this is what they are referring to.
[I can patch binutils all I want, but if I want the official binutils to have those patches.. I have to reassign the copyright to the FSF.]
to post comments)