| |||||||||||||
Kernel developers' position on GPLv3Kernel developers' position on GPLv3Posted Sep 22, 2006 20:46 UTC (Fri) by alexbk (subscriber, #37839)In reply to: Kernel developers' position on GPLv3 by ibukanov Parent article: Kernel developers' position on GPLv3
They only mentioned DRM in the first discussion draft. The second draft changed this to "No
(Log in to post comments)
Kernel developers' position on GPLv3 Posted Sep 22, 2006 21:01 UTC (Fri) by ibukanov (subscriber, #3942) [Link] Thanks, I missed that. It is much better term to use. Still I do not think it covers ROM chips with compiled GPL-ed code, while explicitly says about encryption keys. For example, it prevents a company from offering an option to sign the code through, for example, usb-connected box without revealing the private keys.
Kernel developers' position on GPLv3 Posted Sep 24, 2006 15:40 UTC (Sun) by paulj (subscriber, #341) [Link] You're wrong, the GPLv3 draft allows vendors to sign code (without revealing the signing keys) just fine.
|
|||||||||||||