| |||||||||||||
Kernel developers' position on GPLv3Kernel developers' position on GPLv3Posted Sep 22, 2006 21:44 UTC (Fri) by alonso (subscriber, #2828)In reply to: Kernel developers' position on GPLv3 by gregkh Parent article: Kernel developers' position on GPLv3
You are right, you are not pro DRM. I would had to write:"I don't understand your position against the anti DRM clause in GPLv3". Now is clear to me that you think that a licence is not the right place to assert this. But where you think is the right place?
(Log in to post comments)
GPLv3 allows implementing DRM Posted Sep 23, 2006 2:47 UTC (Sat) by coriordan (guest, #7544) [Link] Keep in mind that GPLv3 does not prohibit DRM, it just protects freedom #1 (the freedom to adapt the software you received to suit your needs) - which enables you to escape from DRM restrictions (if you want to).
|
|||||||||||||