| Weekly edition | Kernel | Security | Distributions | Search |
| Archives | Calendar | Subscribe | Write for LWN | LWN.net FAQ |
What you should (and shouldn't) expect from 64-bit Linux (Linux.com)
What you should (and shouldn't) expect from 64-bit Linux (Linux.com)
Posted Sep 13, 2006 9:12 UTC (Wed) by nix (subscriber, #2304)In reply to: What you should (and shouldn't) expect from 64-bit Linux (Linux.com) by zooko
Parent article: What you should (and shouldn't) expect from 64-bit Linux (Linux.com)
I'm more impressed that you could remember what those awfully-named accessor macros did for long enough to use them. (Or did you do as I did and rename them to something better?)
(Log in to post comments)
What you should (and shouldn't) expect from 64-bit Linux (Linux.com)
Posted Sep 13, 2006 9:25 UTC (Wed) by zooko (subscriber, #2589) [Link]
I just kept the man page in another window nearby.
Renaming them might have been worth it, though.
I was really happy with judy's performance. I look forward to using it again. Somebody should write a Python wrapper...
--Z
What you should (and shouldn't) expect from 64-bit Linux (Linux.com)
Posted Sep 13, 2006 11:11 UTC (Wed) by amk (subscriber, #19) [Link]
Andrew Dalke has written PyJudy.
Py* Dalke?
Posted Sep 13, 2006 12:02 UTC (Wed) by gvy (guest, #11981) [Link]
Hm, the same Dalke who wrapped daylight.com API?
What you should (and shouldn't) expect from 64-bit Linux (Linux.com)
Posted Sep 13, 2006 14:17 UTC (Wed) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]
Oh yes, from functionality, performance, and documentation POVs Judy is amazing. :)