|
Well, maybe there is an argument hereWell, maybe there is an argument herePosted Sep 7, 2006 1:03 UTC (Thu) by JoeBuck (subscriber, #2330)In reply to: YSA (yet still another) by bfields Parent article: Really Free Software (Forbes) Well, Forbes might not be entirely wrong. We're getting a lot of free software because Red Hat and Novell can afford to pay the developers. If Ubuntu succeeds in depressing Red Hat and Novell's revenue, and layoffs follow, Mr. Shuttleworth might not be in a position to hire all the laid-off software developers, rich as he is.
(Log in to post comments)
Why would it be? Posted Sep 7, 2006 6:49 UTC (Thu) by man_ls (subscriber, #15091) [Link] Why would Ubuntu succeed against Red Hat where other excellent distros failed? Gentoo, Debian, even CentOS are reputed and widely merited distributions which are freely available. I don't see why Ubuntu in particular would make a difference.If you buy Red Hat's or Novell's offerings it must be because of support, since their software is available somewhere. Well, Canonical sells support for Ubuntu, and it is not cheap. Free software at its best.
|
Copyright © 2008, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds
Powered by Rackspace Managed Hosting.