| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Fedora Core to drop openmotifFedora Core to drop openmotifPosted Sep 1, 2006 13:56 UTC (Fri) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)In reply to: Fedora Core to drop openmotif by achitnis Parent article: Fedora Core to drop openmotif
First of all, no thats not a official page, its a developers personal wiki space and the mail explicitly mentions that only a recompilation against lesstif would be required.
There is no claim of dropping packages anywhere from the project itself. If the editor has to add a opinion, that should be separated from the news report itself. LWN usually does that by using colored text.
(Log in to post comments)
Fedora Core to drop openmotif Posted Sep 1, 2006 14:15 UTC (Fri) by corbet (editor, #1) [Link] The "personal wiki space" contains the same text which was sent to the lists, and which was discussed by the developers and advisory board. You, Rahul, approved it. It's hard to see how it could be a whole lot more official than that?Meanwhile, I based my conclusions on, among other things, this message from a certain Rahul Sundaram, noting the need to "fix or drop packages as necessary." From that I concluded there would be a need to fix packages, or they might just be dropped. If the issues with all packages have been resolved, and none will be dropped, that is great - and I'll admit I was just a little behind the news.
Fedora Core to drop openmotif Posted Sep 1, 2006 14:45 UTC (Fri) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946) [Link]
I was just pointing out that by itself pages in the wiki under a personal space do not constitute any official opinion.
If you are following mailing list discussions, the above packages were reported to work with lesstif by others
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/200...
Tom Callaway reported that he has tested that the applications and they build fine with lesstif at
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/200...
fbida is the only application in the formal Fedora repositories that required more work even which has already been done.
Fedora Core to drop openmotif Posted Sep 8, 2006 1:11 UTC (Fri) by jschrod (subscriber, #1646) [Link] rahulsundaram asserted:There is no claim of dropping packages anywhere from the project itself.corbet confirmed: I based my conclusions on, among other things, this message from a certain Rahul Sundaram, noting the need to "fix or drop packages as necessary."Was it really necessary to answer with a straw man: I was just pointing out that by itself pages in the wiki under a personal space do not constitute any official opinion.Hit dogs bark, don't they? As a reader who was not involved in the discussion and who doesn't even use Fedora, let me tell you: you might have wanted to "just point out". But then you expressed yourself very badly, much more so than Jonathan did in the Fedora case that you complain so heavily about. At least he cited correctly official Fedora messages, if a bit old. Your answer comes around like childish fingerpointing, just FYI, to give you feedback on your communication style. Cheers, Joachim
Fedora Core to drop openmotif Posted Sep 8, 2006 7:49 UTC (Fri) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946) [Link] The problem with calling people pages "official" is that there are many such wiki pages in Fedora under which we dont track and have half baked project ideas amoung other things. While messages in Rex Dieter's page currently has information that we did discuss, it does not mention that the distribution is dropping any packages either.
I did mention that in a early discussion that we might have to drop packages if they dont compile under lesstif I have pointed out several other mails after that where it was found that it wasnt necessary and one would normally differentiate between developer discusssions and project announcements.
In short, the speculation that caused unnecessary confusion could have been avoided by reading the announcement as well as later mails.
|
|
||||||||||||