Posted Aug 31, 2006 18:29 UTC (Thu) by flewellyn (subscriber, #5047)
[Link]
I'd hardly call CMUCL obsolete. It's a very powerful and actively developed Common Lisp
implementation.
CMU's Common LISP (CMUCL)
Posted Aug 31, 2006 23:04 UTC (Thu) by dwheeler (guest, #1216)
[Link]
But there are many other Common LISP implementations, so in most cases you don't lose basic functionality. And I suspect this is an overzealous dependency anyway; I expect that much of it works without Motif at all, never mind this particular implementation.
My Concern
Posted Sep 1, 2006 0:57 UTC (Fri) by donio (subscriber, #94)
[Link]
Also, CMUCL's Motif interface and the Motif based inspector are optional, I don't think that many people use them nowadays. It should be simple to modify the package to build without these components.