| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Shining more light on the problemShining more light on the problemPosted Aug 25, 2006 19:03 UTC (Fri) by Tet (subscriber, #5433)In reply to: Shining more light on the problem by dowdle Parent article: Who maintains RPM? I would like to comment in defense of Jeff Johnson. I think he was unnecessarily vilified As the original submitter of the bug mentioned, I feel I should comment here. I gave Jeff the benefit of the doubt for a long time, until he proved utterly unable to listen to reason. You can bleat "Show me the code" as much as you like (and I'd even agree with you -- were it more of a problem for me, I'd almost certainly have written a patch myself by now), but a maintainer of a package as significant as RPM simply has to listen to bug reports from users, and take some appropriate action. Denying that the bug even exists is simply not acceptable.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|
||||||||||||