| Weekly edition | Kernel | Security | Distributions | Search |
| Archives | Calendar | Subscribe | Write for LWN | LWN.net FAQ |
Not fair with qmail
Not fair with qmail
Posted Aug 24, 2006 21:30 UTC (Thu) by sergioag (subscriber, #38848)Parent article: A comparison of Mail Transfer Agents - Part One
Surely the author has never read about qmailrocks (http://www.qmailrocks.org). It includes all the patches needed for making qmail a modern MTA, such as Exim or Postfix. There are some other patches (most notably John Simpson's all-in-one qmail patch) which add many other nice features such as IPv6 (which the author says qmail doesn't have in any form), SPF and my others.
I would recommend the author to investigate a little bit more about qmail and he'll write a totally different thing about qmail.
(Log in to post comments)
Not fair with qmail
Posted Sep 17, 2006 13:00 UTC (Sun) by jae (guest, #2369) [Link]
Quite fair. Check the comments... I remember about 3 posts mentioned some cool patches for qmail. Which the author admits too, there are patches. *Patches*. Unlike the competition (Exim, Postfix), it's not *included* in the actual software, but *only* available as patches.