| |||||||||||||
Resolved: firmware is not softwareResolved: firmware is not softwarePosted Aug 24, 2006 19:21 UTC (Thu) by pflugstad (subscriber, #224)In reply to: Resolved: firmware is not software by Los__D Parent article: Resolved: firmware is not software
And the flash to support that is probably more expensive than the ROM would be.
(Log in to post comments)
Resolved: firmware is not software Posted Aug 26, 2006 11:10 UTC (Sat) by broonie (subscriber, #7078) [Link] Not always - due to the need to program the device at some point during production it can be much more cost effective to put a flash device on and program it after the hardware has been assembled. It allows the use of an off the shelf component, which is normally a win, and can be useful to allow production test access to the system.
Resolved: firmware is not software Posted Aug 29, 2006 0:38 UTC (Tue) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313) [Link] if you look at volume pricing of parts flash is still frequently more expensive then ROM (One-Time-Programmable) versions, let alone ones that don't have the flash at all.
also programming the flash frequently requires additional wires and other components in the device, which also cose.
Resolved: firmware is not software Posted Aug 29, 2006 18:05 UTC (Tue) by broonie (subscriber, #7078) [Link] Yes, it does depend on what you're doing - volumes, feature sets and whatnot. Point is that you can't tell which of flash or ROM will work out better until you look at the particular application.
|
|||||||||||||