| |||||||||||||
A comparison of Mail Transfer Agents - Part OneA comparison of Mail Transfer Agents - Part OnePosted Aug 24, 2006 11:42 UTC (Thu) by dark (subscriber, #8483)In reply to: A comparison of Mail Transfer Agents - Part One by job Parent article: A comparison of Mail Transfer Agents - Part One
"Nobody gives gigabytes of memory to each qmail-smtpd process" is a falsifiable statement. If it turns out to be false, will DJB pay out the $500?
(Log in to post comments)
A comparison of Mail Transfer Agents - Part One Posted Sep 5, 2006 13:19 UTC (Tue) by job (guest, #670) [Link] I think the problem has to be in the default configuration. DJB neverclaimed that it was impossible to set up qmail insecurely if you really wanted to. You can even use it as an open relay if you want.
|
|||||||||||||