Sponsored link
Serve your customers, not your servers, with VERIO Linux VPS. Full-access test-drive here.
| Weekly edition | Kernel | Security | Distributions | Search |
| Archives | Calendar | Subscribe | Write for LWN | LWN.net FAQ |
A comparison of Mail Transfer Agents - Part One
A comparison of Mail Transfer Agents - Part One
Posted Aug 24, 2006 11:42 UTC (Thu) by dark (subscriber, #8483)In reply to: A comparison of Mail Transfer Agents - Part One by job
Parent article: A comparison of Mail Transfer Agents - Part One
"Nobody gives gigabytes of memory to each qmail-smtpd process" is a falsifiable statement. If it turns out to be false, will DJB pay out the $500?
(Log in to post comments)
A comparison of Mail Transfer Agents - Part One
Posted Sep 5, 2006 13:19 UTC (Tue) by job (subscriber, #670) [Link]
I think the problem has to be in the default configuration. DJB neverclaimed that it was impossible to set up qmail insecurely if you really
wanted to. You can even use it as an open relay if you want.