Sponsored link
Vyatta –
Linux & Open Source
Alternative to Cisco –
Advanced Routing,
Firewall, VPN, QoS..
Free Download ->
| |||||||||||
AMD maybe considuring releasing open source drivers themselves.AMD maybe considuring releasing open source drivers themselves.Posted Aug 10, 2006 22:09 UTC (Thu) by drag (subscriber, #31333)In reply to: AMD maybe considuring releasing open source drivers themselves. by shane Parent article: Free Intel i965 graphics drivers released
That's pretty odd.. Nvidia and ATI and such already ahve drivers.
The Nvidia binary driver, at it's core, IS the Windows driver. It's the same code as far as anybody can tell.
And their OpenGL stack is probably the same as used in Windows.
Everybody and their mom already supports 3d graphics in Linux because in high-end 3d visualization and animation workstations Linux is 'were it's at'. This is due to a veriaty of reasons, but just remember that when you watch a movie on the big screen and if it has fancy 3d graphics it was probably designed and rendered on Linux machines. The compositions of the scenes and edits on the images are probably done on Linux machines also.
Of course it's a complete propriatory system using propriatory programs and a lot of in-house code, but basicly it's all done using Linux systems.
The problem with the state of 3d graphics in Linux is that none of these companies support Linux properly. No open source 3d graphics.
And people are even willing to pay lots of money for them.
For instance you have the Wildcat line of workstation cards. In Linux the cards themselves cost several hundred dollars, but also the DRIVERS cost several hundred dollars. And they are not paticularly good drivers either.
.... HOWEVER ....
There is a lot of proccessing power in them-there graphics cards. I would expect that high end 3d graphics and scientific computing people would LOVE to get their hands on that and use it in ways that OpenGL doesn't allow.
If you get ATI to open source their drivers then this means that all of a sudden this makes their cards very very desirable.
One of the major reasons high-end people like Movies studios choose Linux over Windows or OS X for a lot of things is that they can do special stuff with the kernel and other useland stuff in isolation. They don't have to share the source code or go into negotiations with some propriatory company or anything like that.
So it would be the same for the drivers. These people would choose ATI not because they want the freedom for freedom sakes, but that they can use the freedom for their own benifit. (which is ultimately the point of all this)
(Log in to post comments)
AMD maybe considuring releasing open source drivers themselves. Posted Aug 10, 2006 22:24 UTC (Thu) by drag (subscriber, #31333) [Link] Oh, and just in case you dont' beleive me..
Look at things like this:
"Disney Animation will be at SIGGRAPH 2006 Boston from August 1st through
PIXAR was at the USENIX 2006 confrence
They used Linux because it was the best aviable, but it still sucks.
They are looking for improvements in debugging tools (basicly gdb is god-awful in their opinion) and such and are willing to pay people to help make it happen.
Anybody want to be paid to advance the state-of-art in Linux debugging tools? :-)
AMD maybe considuring releasing open source drivers themselves. Posted Aug 23, 2006 12:45 UTC (Wed) by csamuel (subscriber, #2624) [Link] There is a lot of proccessing power in them-there graphics cards. I would expect that high end 3d graphics and scientific computing people would LOVE to get their hands on that and use it in ways that OpenGL doesn't allow. Erm, you mean like this ? Personally I'd love to know whether these things do double precision floating point or whether they're just single precision cards..
|
|||||||||||