| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Desktop entry specification 1.0Desktop entry specification 1.0Posted Aug 8, 2006 16:12 UTC (Tue) by pj (subscriber, #4506)In reply to: Desktop entry specification 1.0 by cortana Parent article: Desktop entry specification 1.0
why not submit the whatever to the W3C or whomever to make them non-fake?
(Log in to post comments)
Desktop entry specification 1.0 Posted Aug 8, 2006 17:17 UTC (Tue) by cortana (subscriber, #24596) [Link] The same reason why it's not a good idea to have an SSL and a non-SSL version of every protocol scheme; we end up with millions and millions of protocol schemes, when we only need one (http).
|
|
||||||||||||