| |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
Kernel Summit 2006: Software suspendKernel Summit 2006: Software suspendPosted Jul 27, 2006 14:19 UTC (Thu) by rvfh (subscriber, #31018)In reply to: Kernel Summit 2006: Software suspend by maks Parent article: Kernel Summit 2006: Software suspend > nobody needs again 2 in kernel solutions. swsusp and uswsusp? Isn't that TWO broken in-kernel solutions? I don't care that swsusp and suspend2 SHOULD fail on the same machines: they don't. Suspend2 is successful where swsusp is NOT. Example: my wife's laptop. And that's pure FACT, no opinion. And I also don't care that uswsusp COULD do the same as Suspend2, because for now it does not. Suspend2 is FASTER then Windows and just as good. As a last note, I remark than Andrew Morton himself does not like the idea of user-land suspend. So what are they waiting for? A few changes to the patches? Let them come along, and let's have Suspend2 in the kernel. QUICK! We're six YEARS late!
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||