| |||||||||||
What about other headers?What about other headers?Posted Jul 27, 2006 1:11 UTC (Thu) by mikov (subscriber, #33179)In reply to: What about other headers? by dlang Parent article: OLS: A proposal for a new networking API
Thanks for pointing this - I must be falling behind the times because I didn't know about Opteron's IOMMU. I found a good description here: http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/white_papers...
Is there equivalent functionality in Intel's chipsets (since they can't put it in the CPU) ? If not, it doesn't seem prudent to rely on it for zero-copy.
(Log in to post comments)
What about other headers? Posted Jul 27, 2006 1:51 UTC (Thu) by dlang (subscriber, #313) [Link] My understanding is that the Intel chips do not have an IOMMU at this time.
however this just means that the kernel and drivers have to fall back to the non-zero-copy mechanism if the hardware doesn't support scatter-gather nativly
it's a matter of useing it if it's there, and doing the best you can if it's not (and remember that if you compile the kernel for Opteron-only as opposed to K8 architecture you get more performance becouse you get to leave out the tests for the IOMMU and the code to handle it, so it doesn't always cost you :-)
|
|||||||||||