| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
What about other headers?What about other headers?Posted Jul 26, 2006 18:33 UTC (Wed) by mikov (subscriber, #33179)In reply to: What about other headers? by dlang Parent article: OLS: A proposal for a new networking API
Do all (most) Ethernet adapters support scatter-gather DMA ?
(Log in to post comments)
What about other headers? Posted Jul 26, 2006 19:11 UTC (Wed) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313) [Link] the higher-end cards support scatter-gather, but with an Opteron and it's IOMMU this functionality is available without the card needing to support it (the IOMMU remaps the address space so that the card thinks it's doing a old-fashiond single-area DMA, when it's really pulling/pushing the info to multiple sections of ram)
David Lang
What about other headers? Posted Jul 27, 2006 1:11 UTC (Thu) by mikov (subscriber, #33179) [Link] Thanks for pointing this - I must be falling behind the times because I didn't know about Opteron's IOMMU. I found a good description here: http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/white_papers...
Is there equivalent functionality in Intel's chipsets (since they can't put it in the CPU) ? If not, it doesn't seem prudent to rely on it for zero-copy.
What about other headers? Posted Jul 27, 2006 1:51 UTC (Thu) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313) [Link] My understanding is that the Intel chips do not have an IOMMU at this time.
however this just means that the kernel and drivers have to fall back to the non-zero-copy mechanism if the hardware doesn't support scatter-gather nativly
it's a matter of useing it if it's there, and doing the best you can if it's not (and remember that if you compile the kernel for Opteron-only as opposed to K8 architecture you get more performance becouse you get to leave out the tests for the IOMMU and the code to handle it, so it doesn't always cost you :-)
|
|
||||||||||||