| |||||||||||||
Ubuntu Linux 6.06 review (Jem Report)Ubuntu Linux 6.06 review (Jem Report)Posted Jul 26, 2006 17:56 UTC (Wed) by TwoTimeGrime (guest, #11688)In reply to: Ubuntu Linux 6.06 review (Jem Report) by drag Parent article: Ubuntu Linux 6.06 review (Jem Report)
> I mean _SERIOUSLY_ Not even windows comes with a Java development environment.
But MacOS X does. What point are you trying to make?
(Log in to post comments)
Ubuntu Linux 6.06 review (Jem Report) Posted Jul 26, 2006 18:41 UTC (Wed) by drag (subscriber, #31333) [Link] The point is that it's stupid to critize a OS based on how 'Enterprise Ready' it is when you can't even be bothered to type "ubuntu" into a google search, or visit Ubuntu's website and read the bare minimum of documentation.
This reviewer is basing how 'enterprise ready' something is based on the experiances of going through a installer, which is just silly.
Ya I can't expect a average user to know what repositories are having come straight from Windows, but I can expect them to at least look through the basic documentation provided for them. I mean it's not even 'man' files or anything.
Ubuntu Linux 6.06 review (Jem Report) Posted Jul 27, 2006 13:06 UTC (Thu) by emj (guest, #14307) [Link] The point is that GIJ is unworkable for most people, and installing that makes you think you have a java installed but you don't, only a subsitute. So that give me loads of email saying "hey this application doesn't work under Ubuntu Fix!!".
That's not fun..
|
|||||||||||||