| |||||||||||||
GCC evolutionGCC evolutionPosted Jul 26, 2006 4:57 UTC (Wed) by Kluge (guest, #2881)Parent article: OLS: GCC: present and future
No mention of things like the use of LLVM as a backend, I take it?
(Log in to post comments)
re: LLVM Posted Jul 27, 2006 9:18 UTC (Thu) by dank (guest, #1865) [Link] I wasn't there, but for those who are wonderingabout the status of LLVM and GCC, the most recent posts I know of are http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-03/msg00706.html (as of March, copyright assignment papers hadn't yet been signed) http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-06/msg00153.html (as of June, the rival LTO proposal is moving ahead)
Can somebody who was at the lto/llvm discussion at the gcc summit comment?
And for those who are wondering what LLVM and LTO are,
re: LLVM Posted Jul 27, 2006 14:51 UTC (Thu) by Kluge (guest, #2881) [Link] Thanks. I hadn't heard of the LTO proposal.
|
|||||||||||||