Kernel Summit 2006: Development process II
Posted Jul 20, 2006 9:34 UTC (Thu) by
nix (subscriber, #2304)
In reply to:
Kernel Summit 2006: Development process II by neilbrown
Parent article:
Kernel Summit 2006: Development process II
Actually, in rather too many cases it's been to be told that your code is crap because Christoph doesn't like the idea, e.g. if I recall correctly this happened to kprobes / systrace. You can tell when that happens because there's even less actual information there than normal and because this often happens before you even submit patches (and often because other kernel devs tell him to shut up: i.e. this *is* self-correcting, and when not misfiring Christoph does a useful service. He *could* do with lessons in tact from, say, Al Viro. ;} )
(
Log in to post comments)