| |||||||||||
Kernel Summit 2006: SecurityKernel Summit 2006: SecurityPosted Jul 19, 2006 3:24 UTC (Wed) by dang (subscriber, #310)Parent article: Kernel Summit 2006: Security
"Stephen noted that LSM has little use for SELinux, that things could work just as well without it"
Other way 'round?
(Log in to post comments)
Kernel Summit 2006: Security Posted Jul 19, 2006 6:32 UTC (Wed) by flewellyn (subscriber, #5047) [Link] Not necessarily; it's a somewhat odd construction, but "has use for" could be construed to mean"is useful to", as in "that has little use for me".
It's rather archaic, but I've seen the phrasing used in some older (read: Victorian and earlier)
|
|||||||||||