Kernel Summit 2006: Software suspend
Posted Jul 18, 2006 23:11 UTC (Tue) by bojan
In reply to: Kernel Summit 2006: Software suspend
Parent article: Kernel Summit 2006: Software suspend
> the hole suspend2 base is much to huge to get gobbed on once. even ubuntu cares about driver fixes these days.
Split Suspend2 patches were posted to LKML recently. Sure, there were real technical complaints from people that actually reviewed the patches - all of these are being addressed as I understand, with some of the stuff already done.
Unfortunately, some other developers have chosen to repeat myths about Suspend2 instead of actually reviewing the code. Like: don't have userui in kernel - it hasn't been there for a while. Or: can you remove crytpo/compression - well, ignore two files from the patch etc. I guess Nigel is right when he says that the initial invasive nature of Suspend2 patches is still lingering in the air, although it hasn't been true for a while now.
> make out of swsusp and suspend2 a great in tree suspend3
Well, that would be a great outcome. However, it seems that it isn't going to happen. Current suspend subsystem maintainer wants to keep the in-kernel code (mostly) the way it is to reduce complexity. I was under the impression that Linux kernel has gone way past that point (i.e. of being really simple) with the introduction of many advanced features, but then again I don't know the code of it, so I'm probably wrong.
to post comments)