Denial of reality vulnerabilities
Posted Jul 13, 2006 20:16 UTC (Thu) by giraffedata
Parent article: Denial of reality vulnerabilities
This editorial seems to be arguing with somebody, but whom?
I assume the descriptions of the bug as a DOS are just errors. If the author had realized there's a way to exploit it to get privilege escalation, he would have written it up that way. Is someone still claiming the original description is appropriate?
If it's just an editorial against making mistakes, there's not much point -- it's preaching to the converted.
to post comments)