| |||||||||||||
The end of the multiarch era?The end of the multiarch era?Posted Jul 13, 2006 13:08 UTC (Thu) by corbet (editor, #1)In reply to: The end of the multiarch era? by skvidal Parent article: The end of the multiarch era? Whoa, Seth, sorry you took it so personally. Certainly wasn't my intent. A couple of things: 1) I'm running development distributions; I expect strange things to happen every now and then. One can only laugh at them, that's what I tried to do. 2) I do get onto the fedora-test list occasionally when things go really wrong. I have also occasionally put things into bugzilla. I have certainly posted about the challenges of keeping multiarch systems current in the past (though not recently). Believe it or not, this article was not an attack on Fedora - it was a discussion of how it's getting better.
(Log in to post comments)
The end of the multiarch era? Posted Jul 13, 2006 14:58 UTC (Thu) by cventers (subscriber, #31465) [Link] 25 comments, many of them firey :)
That's how you know you've written a good article.
PS: I think Multiarch support is important. But good article! :)
The end of the multiarch era? Posted Jul 13, 2006 20:32 UTC (Thu) by dmantione (guest, #4640) [Link] If a president holds a speech that it would be a good idea to disband thearmy that will cause a lot of discussion. However, that does not mean it is necessarily a good speech.
Which reinforces only Posted Jul 18, 2006 4:19 UTC (Tue) by xoddam (subscriber, #2322) [Link] that there is a difference between an editor and a Commander in Chief.Powerful interests don't need to 'hold speeches' when they 0wn the network media and the voting machines.
|
|||||||||||||