LWN.net Logo

Distribution support: how long is long enough?

Distribution support: how long is long enough?

Posted Jan 2, 2003 9:22 UTC (Thu) by beejaybee (guest, #1581)
Parent article: Distribution support: how long is long enough?

1) There is a point which may be being missed. The notice posted by Red Hat indicates the end of support for (at least) Sparc & Alpha systems.

2) There is a difference between bugfix support & vulnerability support. Personally I think vendors have a responsibility to issue patches for critical vulnerabilities (those which could result in a system being rooted, converted into a spam relay or warez host etc) for a lot longer than 14 months.

Naturally there has to be a cutoff point somewhere, and I do appreciate that there is a world of difference between the end of support from an individual linux distributor and the end of support for linux. But I would hope that Red Hat could set a positive example by promising support for critical vulnerabilities for at least a couple of years beyond their recently announced policy.


(Log in to post comments)

Distribution support: how long is long enough?

Posted Jan 7, 2003 15:22 UTC (Tue) by kreutzm (subscriber, #4700) [Link]

I totally agree with 1), especially since the support was dropped *IMMEDIATELY* and not at a certain date. Also they should have directed their customers to the HP sponsored version of RH 7.2, even if they do not directly sell it.

Copyright © 2012, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds