Sponsored link
Serve your customers, not your servers, with VERIO Linux VPS. Full-access test-drive here.
| Weekly edition | Kernel | Security | Distributions | Search |
| Archives | Calendar | Subscribe | Write for LWN | LWN.net FAQ |
Binary trees considered harmful
Binary trees considered harmful
Posted Jun 29, 2006 17:21 UTC (Thu) by cventers (subscriber, #31465)In reply to: Binary trees considered harmful by nix
Parent article: Trees II: red-black trees
True, but so is RCU. I wonder if HP would give an explicit license to GPL
code (since they released the Judy library on Sourceforge as LGPL, along
with some "confidential" internal paper about Judy).
(Log in to post comments)
Binary trees considered harmful
Posted Jun 30, 2006 15:56 UTC (Fri) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]
Yeah. It's a shame that the accessor macros and the code are so horribly named/unreadable. It's almost obfuscated-yet-heavily-commented...