Why not have X-Windows store the COMPRESSED image?
Posted Jun 28, 2006 21:56 UTC (Wed) by
allesfresser (subscriber, #216)
In reply to:
Why not have X-Windows store the COMPRESSED image? by dwheeler
Parent article:
Interview: Jim Gettys (Part I)
Possibly the compression and decompression would eat a lot of CPU, and therefore power, which would be bad. I could see that being the case, especially if there's a lot of not-very-compressible pixmaps floating around.
(
Log in to post comments)