LWN.net Logo

Obviously incorrect 2003 predictions

It's that time of year again. Traditionally the first LWN Weekly Edition of the year includes some predictions of what may happen in the near future. It is worthwhile, occasionally, to step back and think about what may be on the horizon, even though the real thing will, as always, include surprises that we are not able to anticipate.

Besides, real news tends to be scarce about now.

So, without further ado, here's a few Obviously Incorrect Predictions for the next year.

  • Use of Linux in government will increase, especially outside of the U.S. Government, officials are increasingly concerned about security, long-term public access to records, costs, and the health of the local software industry. Free software offers help in all of those areas. Governments move slowly, but there will be significant steps toward governmental adoption of free software in the coming year.

  • There will be high-profile desktop deployments, inside and outside of government. Linux as a desktop system is good enough for many users now, and is only getting better. As the number of success stories grows, more organizations will take the plunge and switch over to free software.

  • There will be a direct patent challenge to one or more free software products. Thus far, there has been a great deal of nervousness about software patents, and people have occasionally had to code their way around patent issues. But there has been a distinct lack of actual infringement suits. Suing a free software user for patent infringement will be a powerful way of creating uncertainty throughout the community, however; 2003 may well be the year that this weapon gets used.

  • It will be a watershed year in intellectual property law, but we are not foolish enough to try to predict which way it will go. It could be that, in 2003, copyright extension is struck down, the DMCA is revised and defanged, and the entertainment industry figures out that it needs to go after pirates instead of harassing its customers. Or the courts could be hostile, the CBDTPA could be passed, new encryption restrictions could surface, and "trusted computing systems" could come closer to reality.

    The first scenario is not out of the question. The copyright extension and ElcomSoft cases have done a lot to raise awareness of the excesses of American (and, increasingly, worldwide) intellectual property law. The costs (and vulnerabilities) of copy protection systems are increasingly apparent to all. We won the encryption battle, and we could well win this one too. But the forces behind the attempted intellectual property takeover will not give up easily. One way or the other, 2003 will be interesting.

  • The 2.6 kernel will be released, but probably not until well into the second half of the year. Chances are the 2.7 development series will not open in 2003. Of course, all bets are off if Linus starts accepting new developments in 2.5, but chances are that will not happen.

  • There will be a SourceForge crisis in 2003. SourceForge is operated by a company which is still bleeding cash, and which no longer has any real interest in free software. VA Software's investors and board are bound to question the value of the free SourceForge service. That service may well be cut back - or start demanding some sort of payment - in the coming year.

  • UnitedLinux will not be enough to save all four of its participants; at least one of them will probably exit the distribution business by the end of the year. MandrakeSoft, which is in a cash crunch as of this writing, will pull through with support from its users and emerge as a viable (if smaller) company.

Those are our guesses for what this year holds for Linux and free software. These predictions are offered in the hope that they will be useful, but they come with NO WARRANTY regarding their fitness for any particular purpose or relation to any sort of reality.


(Log in to post comments)

Your previous (2002) predictions

Posted Jan 2, 2003 3:50 UTC (Thu) by fyodor (subscriber, #3481) [Link]

While making your new 2003 predictions, its too bad you didn't also review (or even link to) your 2002 predictions. For the record, here they are:
  • Linux systems will suffer a major security incident -- I guess we had the Slapper worm, although I think we did far better than MS in 2003. I'm surprised the press hasn't taken more notice of the horrendous beating IE has been taking in the last few months. If feels like groups such as PivX and Greymagic have been finding critical, remotely exploitable code-execution bugs every week (on average -- they come in clumps)!
  • We will lose a major distributor -- It sounds like you renewed this one to your 2003 prediction that at least one of the 4 UnitedLinux partners will "exit the distribution business". I find "one" to be a conservative estimate.
  • Workable free software business models will begin to emerge -- Maybe. The Tech market (including Linux) is still pretty darn bleak, although many Linux shops have been holding their own. I find the Redhat "Advanced Server" program, their increased emphasis on a subscription model, and some of the IBM embracement of Linux interesting in this light.
  • Desktop Linux will be taken far more seriously -- This is another renewal to your 2003 list. Who knows, this might finally be the year. I am a bit skeptical that we will make huge progress in popular (non-geek) desktop adoption.
  • The legal situation will get murkier -- Here you presciently noted that "A high-level U.S. court ruling against the DMCA is possible". I don't know if the Dmitry court counts as "high level", but you deserve credit for this one :).
  • Alternative kernel trees will grow in importance -- Many (probably most) people have used their distribution's kernels for years now. I don't know that alternative tree poopularity has actually increased.

Nobody is perfect, but I find your predictions more insightful than most other lists. In a similar vein, I really miss your old "Linux in History" section. Most importantly, I'm hoping LWN will be around to do many more annual predictions, whether they turn out to be accurate or not :).

--Fyodor@Insecure.Org
Concerned about your network security? Try the Free Nmap Security Scanner

typo

Posted Jan 4, 2003 22:33 UTC (Sat) by skybrian (subscriber, #365) [Link]

Shouldn't that be "Government officials are increasingly concerned" in the first prediction? (no comma)

Copyright © 2003, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds