SPF on vger
Posted Jun 22, 2006 15:54 UTC (Thu) by forthy
In reply to: SPF on vger
Parent article: SPF on vger
I agree that SPF is not a good idea, but I support it (not just lip
service), for two purposes:
- it gets me rid of all those "security updates from Microsoft"
before my virus checker gets to see them (since microsoft.com has a SPF
- it adds up to the pain for using SMTP that it might help to overthrow
it - especially when it is adopted.
I view SPF not as a solution to a specific problem, but as a nail on
the coffin of SMTP, and I'm ready to adopt the next nail if I can find
to post comments)