| |||||||||||||
Ext3 for large filesystemsExt3 for large filesystemsPosted Jun 16, 2006 0:33 UTC (Fri) by sbergman27 (guest, #10767)Parent article: Ext3 for large filesystems
Does this all mean that ext3/4 with these patches would handle 1024 PB on a 32 bit system? Or only on a 64 bit system?
My understanding is that even XFS has a maximum filesystem size of only 16TB on 32 bit, even though it goes to 9 EB on 64 bit systems.
(Log in to post comments)
Ext3 for large filesystems Posted Mar 12, 2007 15:38 UTC (Mon) by sandeen (guest, #42852) [Link] > My understanding is that even XFS has a maximum filesystem size of only 16TB on 32 bit, even though it goes to 9 EB on 64 bit systems.
Though xfs is fully 64-bit capable on 32-bit machines, the 16T limit is OS-imposed. There is a 32-bit index into the (4k) page cache on x86, so 2^32 * 4096 is 16T is the maximum offset that can be addressed.
Ext3 for large filesystems Posted Mar 20, 2007 16:32 UTC (Tue) by BrucePerens (guest, #2510) [Link] Not too long ago, Unix systems replaced seek() with the lseek(), and were able to handle longer offsets even though they were 16-bit machines. The word width of your CPU in no way limits the width of words upon which you can perform arithmetic. The new 48-bit field is not using compiler types wider than 32 bits for its implementation. They could use "long long", but I suppose that's less portable.Bruce
|
|||||||||||||