| |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
Runit makes a speedy replacement for init (Linux.com)Runit makes a speedy replacement for init (Linux.com)Posted May 26, 2006 11:34 UTC (Fri) by k8to (subscriber, #15413)In reply to: Runit makes a speedy replacement for init (Linux.com) by Duncan Parent article: Runit makes a speedy replacement for init (Linux.com)
Runit may not bring speed benefits over other parallel approaches, but it
Avoid.
(Log in to post comments)
Runit makes a speedy replacement for init (Linux.com) Posted May 26, 2006 11:58 UTC (Fri) by kirkengaard (subscriber, #15022) [Link] yeah, I especially love djb's package/ hierarchy as dictated by the install page. Mmmm ... general unpleasantness and FHS flaming ...
Runit makes a speedy replacement for init (Linux.com) Posted May 26, 2006 17:39 UTC (Fri) by charlieb (subscriber, #23340) [Link] Use of /package is not mandatory. runit can easily be built to install in an FHS compliant way.
Get over it.
Runit makes a speedy replacement for init (Linux.com) Posted May 26, 2006 23:17 UTC (Fri) by kirkengaard (subscriber, #15022) [Link] "Dude, harsh." You needed the last poke?
I'm over it, and I had figured that out. I have no complaints about the software. It has good ideas. It works. This makes the install page no less pushy; I like software that lets me do the administration. Still, djb's idea carries a kernel of good thought, implemented in FHS-antagonistic fashion. That's what /usr/local is for. But configure your system how it works for you.
And calm down some.
Runit makes a speedy replacement for init (Linux.com) Posted May 26, 2006 17:43 UTC (Fri) by charlieb (subscriber, #23340) [Link] "vastly overcomplicated configuration"? One directory containing a subdirectory for each service to be run, each of those containing at minimum *one* file - a "run" script.
"Avoid." That's your advice. My advice is "Try it".
|
|||||||||||