| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
System Rescue CDSystem Rescue CDPosted May 19, 2006 19:40 UTC (Fri) by Ed_L. (guest, #24287)In reply to: System Rescue CD by pflugstad Parent article: A quick look at the GParted live CD (Linux.com)
Sorry, you are absolutely correct and I was far too verbose. The short answer is that neither Gparted nor System Rescue's QtParted would parted my SATA drive. Knoppix's would. Period.
Thanks.
(Log in to post comments)
System Rescue CD Posted May 19, 2006 20:14 UTC (Fri) by h2 (guest, #27965) [Link] Ed_L, I've found that in certain circumstances gparted 0.1 successfully partitioned etc a disk where 0.2 failed, so I just keep a few copies around.
It's my guess that the reason knoppix worked for you, the old version, was exactly because of this oddity, you were simply using an older release of parted within knoppix.
I just keep all my gparted livecds now, usually the latest doesn't work.
It has however worked fine on all the sata drives I've run it on so far, but that probably will vary motherboard to motherboard, sata chipset to sata chipset.
Overall, however, I've really come to love this tool, it's a perfect example of unix's idea of do one thing well in a small application.
Each version is more elegant than the last too, which doesn't hurt.
But it's not perfect, it is afterall at 0.2.x, which means the author knows it's not perfect, but it's pretty darned good as far as I'm concerned, it's my first choice of partitioning tools now, and it's become the first recommended choice of distros like kanotix.
That's the livecd however, not the installed program version, which I avoid. And qtparted is far too buggy to be trusted with any disk partitioning at all as far as I'm concerned.
System Rescue CD Posted May 19, 2006 20:16 UTC (Fri) by h2 (guest, #27965) [Link] typo: I meant, usually the latest does work, but in the rare cases it doesn't, I go back to the older version to see if it will work. And so far one of these options has worked on almost everything I've tried it on.
System Rescue CD Posted May 19, 2006 22:31 UTC (Fri) by Ed_L. (guest, #24287) [Link] "It has however worked fine on all the sata drives I've run it on so far, but that probably will vary motherboard to motherboard, sata chipset to sata chipset."Well yes, that was (intended to be) part of my orginal point. On my particular mainboard the newer parted's wouldn't, and for whatever reason the older one on Knoppix 4.0.2 would. Your success with Gparted LiveCD on sata drives is a very useful bit of information to me, and thanks. As are your reservations r.e. QtParted. And I agree, one shouldn't expect The World from a 0.2 release. I didn't and don't. I was also trying to be reasonably generous with Fedora, which I have used (almost) exclusively since its inception, and Red Hat before that. Thanks for your informative reply.
System Rescue CD Posted May 20, 2006 12:52 UTC (Sat) by burdicda (guest, #10272) [Link] Tried the latest 2.5 i think and it would not copy (image) at all....
It just sat there and did nothing when "copy" was clicked...
Have to go back to prev and check it out....
Makes ya wonder...Don't these dev's try before release LOL
System Rescue CD Posted May 20, 2006 22:57 UTC (Sat) by h2 (guest, #27965) [Link] burdicda, unfortunately most devs don't have build labs filled with every possible hard drive/mobo combination, so they depend on user feedback to deal with bugs.
Would be great if some way was found to give heavy duty build lab testing to every new version of any major open source application, but I guess for now just having users give good bug reports is as good as we can hope for.
I had the same experience as you though, 0.1 worked on one system when 0.2 did not, but overall the stability and range of supported systems seems to be consistently expanding version to version, though of course bugs will creep in version to version.
have to give a 'thanks' to the gparted livecd guys, good idea, implementation gets better all the time.
|
|
||||||||||||