| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
But 2.7 is openBut 2.7 is openPosted May 13, 2006 23:50 UTC (Sat) by BackSeat (subscriber, #1886)In reply to: But 2.7 is open by JoeBuck Parent article: Linux kernel 'getting buggier,' leader says (ZDNet) There really isn't anything that could go into 2.7 that isn't going in to 2.6-latest right now. Exactly. Which is why we need a 2.7. Using the "stable" branch for new features, algorithm changes and bug-shaking isn't what users want. I could accept that the traditional development model based around odd/even minor version numbers might not work for the developers, but the 2.6 development model has only shifted the dissatisfaction to the consumers: it's hard to see that as a desirable outcome.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|
||||||||||||