| |||||||||||||
On the safety of Linux random numbersOn the safety of Linux random numbersPosted May 12, 2006 7:35 UTC (Fri) by ncm (subscriber, #165)In reply to: On the safety of Linux random numbers by kleptog Parent article: On the safety of Linux random numbers
That astonishes me too. I always assumed they were using low bits of the cycle counter. It seems an easy patch. Any clue why it hasn't been done?
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||