The AppArmor debate begins
Posted Apr 27, 2006 6:56 UTC (Thu) by nix
In reply to: The AppArmor debate begins
Parent article: The AppArmor debate begins
This is the *point* of the learning system. The idea is that you run your target app in learning mode while it is *not* being attacked (which basically runs it with everything banned, but with the system set to log, not deny failed operations, and then analyzes the logfile). The resulting policy will only allow the target app to do what it did while you were running it in learning mode, which may include... unexpected things.
If you want to know *why* those unexpected things are being done, you'll have to examine the app's source code: and oddly enough Crispin didn't want to do that for a monster like Thunderbird.
This is (yet another place) where *exactly* the same criticism can be made of SELinux, except that of course because it doesn't have a learning mode you'll have to do the log analysis yourself.
to post comments)