| |||||||||||||
LWN on-topic vs off-topic contentLWN on-topic vs off-topic contentPosted Dec 16, 2002 10:50 UTC (Mon) by alan (subscriber, #4018)In reply to: LWN on-topic vs off-topic content by Peter Parent article: The LWN.net 2002 Linux Timeline For what it is worth as a subscriber, I would also like to see more *BSD news, but frankly there doesn't seem to be that much coverage in the press. Kerneltrap does a decent job of mixing all free unix kernel info. Oracle, and news about other major application vendors, et al. may not matter to you very much, but there are whole worlds of people to whom this information does matter, part of my job as an admin is in finding solutions for my employer on linux as a platform, and therefore am most certianly interested. Also LWN is trying to attract corporate accounts, people to whom this sort of information matters. What is nice about the LWN format is that it is nicely broken up and I can quickly scan down to things that are most relevant to me. Since I like to be up to date, aware, and at least semi knowledgeable about things that don't even directly affect me, I end up reading the full bigpage. I never can get enough. Kudos to LWN for a job very well done, between lkml, kerneltrap, and your kernel page, I stay well informed.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||