The future of the Linux Security Module API
Posted Apr 20, 2006 19:30 UTC (Thu) by hingo
In reply to: The future of the Linux Security Module API
Parent article: The future of the Linux Security Module API
So you are saying that according to the upstream review process, you cannot get another LSM user included if it does roughly the same thing as SELinux or a subset of it and also that if SELinux is the only LSM user in the kernel mainline it will be removed... nice logic.
(Nothing personal, I just realised that what you described might actually be close to reality.)
to post comments)