Recent Features
| |||||||||||||
Unsupported hardwareUnsupported hardwarePosted Apr 11, 2006 9:42 UTC (Tue) by johill (subscriber, #25196)In reply to: Unsupported hardware by davidw Parent article: The 2006 Wireless Networking Summit
Obviously that list isn't maintained anyway (most broadcom cards work fine), so...
(Log in to post comments)
Unsupported hardware Posted Apr 11, 2006 19:10 UTC (Tue) by davidw (subscriber, #947) [Link] Uh, it is maintained. By its users. If you see something incorrect, please make an effort to let us know.
I created that site as a wiki, because no one person can keep up with a list of what doesn't work (or what does, for that matter).
Unsupported hardware lists Posted Apr 12, 2006 0:46 UTC (Wed) by johill (subscriber, #25196) [Link] You realise that there are probably half a dozen such lists out there? That said, one of the points of the conference was to set up a new linux wireless site that collects information, so watch for announcements.
Also, having a negative list is imo stupid. You'll never know about all devices out there, so having a positive list is much more useful.
Unsupported hardware lists Posted Apr 12, 2006 2:25 UTC (Wed) by bk (guest, #25617) [Link] Exactly the opposite. In 1995 it made sense to have a list of hardware that worked. The rule now is that a given piece of hardware will work unless there's something strange or non-standard about it. Leenooks.com is a good idea, especially the fact that it's a wiki.
|
|||||||||||||