| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Ubuntu "Dapper" delay proposedUbuntu "Dapper" delay proposedPosted Mar 13, 2006 1:39 UTC (Mon) by jcm (subscriber, #18262)Parent article: Ubuntu "Dapper" delay proposed
They probably want to avoid bugs like the following from sticking around for 5 years: https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/...
Jon.
(Log in to post comments)
Ubuntu "Dapper" delay proposed Posted Mar 13, 2006 22:30 UTC (Mon) by daniels (subscriber, #16193) [Link] Except for the bit where it explicitly says dapper wasn't vulnerable, as wasn't hoary, or warty ...
Ubuntu "Dapper" delay proposed Posted Mar 13, 2006 22:46 UTC (Mon) by jcm (subscriber, #18262) [Link] Except for the bit where I used the word "like" to indicate bugs *like* the one I referenced. Big annoying bugs that stick around for 5 years are not something you would want to have. I was saying that it's worth getting it right the first time.
Jon.
|
|
||||||||||||