| |||||||||||||
In the cycle towards 2.6.16In the cycle towards 2.6.16Posted Mar 9, 2006 17:36 UTC (Thu) by madscientist (subscriber, #16861)In reply to: In the cycle towards 2.6.16 by AnswerGuy Parent article: RCU and open file accounting
I'm quite confident that there's no way a patch like this would ever be considered for a bugfix release like 2.6.16.1. It's far too big and intrusive, and, honestly, not severe enough to justify the risk.
It'll either squeek into 2.6.16, or be deferred until 2.6.17.
(Log in to post comments)
In the cycle towards 2.6.16 Posted Mar 9, 2006 19:05 UTC (Thu) by PaulMcKenney (subscriber, #9624) [Link] Looks to me like it actually did go into the 2.6.16 stream.
|
|||||||||||||