|
Links to more filtersLinks to more filtersPosted Mar 7, 2006 22:08 UTC (Tue) by jaalto (guest, #36348)Parent article: The Grumpy Editor's guide to bayesian spam filters Here is one study [1] I wrote on the subject that may interest readers. See under topic "3.2 Advice for the normal account" where several bayesian tools are discussed. http://pm-lib.sf.net/README.html Another article with tests titled: *Spam* *Filters* by Sam Holden http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/964/ Jari [1]
1.0 Thoughts about increasing spam annoyance
1.1 Bouncing messages do no good
1.2 Rule based systems are not the solution
1.3 Challenge-Response systems make matters worse
1.3.1 Challenge-Response is not a doorbell but a gun shooting decoys
1.3.2 Modern C-R systems are no better
1.3.3 Questioning Challenge-Response system implementations
1.3.4 Summary - What are the effects of Challenge-Response systems
1.3.5 Further reading - Mail, C-R systems, Spam
1.3.6 Further reading - Some known C-R systems
1.4 Spam appearing in your yard - a story
2.0 A lightweight UBE block system with pure procmail
2.1 Suitable for accounts which ...
2.2 Where to put "pure procmail" UBE checks?
2.3 Using Procmail Module Library to fight spam
3.0 A heavyweight UBE blocking system
3.1 Advice for Debian Exim 4 mail system administrator
3.2 Advice for the normal account
3.3 Configuring Bayesian programs
3.4 A heavyweight spam catch setup using procmail
(Log in to post comments)
Python based?! Posted Oct 5, 2007 16:55 UTC (Fri) by johill (subscriber, #25196) [Link] Not sure I want to read an article that classifies crm114 as a "python based tool"...
|
Copyright © 2008, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds
Powered by Rackspace Managed Hosting.