Grammar usage: eg vs ie
Posted Dec 5, 2002 4:45 UTC (Thu) by
simon_kitching (guest, #4874)
Parent article:
Coming soon: gnucash 1.8
Don't you hate people criticising grammar ? :-)
However, this one is getting so prevalent (and LWN is such a shining light of journalism) I can't resist:
(from http://www.jpschoemer.com/MostCommonErrors.html)
- e.g., exemplia gratia, means for example;
- i.e., id est, means that is to say, and references words synonymous with the preceding statement.
I believe both usages of "i.e." below should be "e.g.":
(i.e. you can't put your company's address onto invoices in anything but image form), and important features (i.e. payroll) are lacking.
The acronym "i.e." implies that the explanation you are making is the only possible explanation, while "e.g." is an example.
If payroll were the only lacking feature, then "i.e." would be appropriate.
Sorry :-)
(
Log in to post comments)