Tweaks to madvise() and posix_fadvise()
Posted Feb 17, 2006 3:53 UTC (Fri) by
roelofs (subscriber, #2599)
In reply to:
Tweaks to madvise() and posix_fadvise() by jgsack@san.rr.com
Parent article:
Tweaks to madvise() and posix_fadvise()
I think I'm missing a point, somewhere in the following para:
I think the only thing you missed is that driver != child. The article speaks of parent-driver communication; you conflated that to parent-child communication (or so it appears).
Apologies if I've misunderstood your misunderstanding. ;-)
Greg
(
Log in to post comments)