Recent Features
| |||||||||||||
Cracking Passwords with John the RipperCracking Passwords with John the RipperPosted Feb 16, 2006 3:29 UTC (Thu) by primorec (guest, #2740)Parent article: Cracking Passwords with John the Ripper
I have no idea what I am doing wrong. Or in other words, I am not able to download the source code of the package. I've tried to download it from the original site ( http://www.openwall.com/john/)
Result was in both cases the same. Download was not successeful. All I've gotten on the screen was:
ftp> get john-1.7.tar.bz2
(Log in to post comments)
Security tools considered harmful Posted Feb 16, 2006 4:04 UTC (Thu) by xoddam (subscriber, #2322) [Link] It's not you, it's your virus-scanning ftp proxy. Someone thinkssecurity tools are bad for you. Do you have the same problem when you use http instead? If not, or if you can simply use ftp without the proxy, fine. If you can't go around it (your firewall blocks or diverts all outgoing ftp transactions), you'll have to bring it in from elsewhere.
Security tools considered harmful Posted Feb 16, 2006 4:41 UTC (Thu) by primorec (guest, #2740) [Link] It's not you, it's your virus-scanning ftp proxy.
Very likely.. yes... I was behind the company firewall (and all other thingies)
Someone thinks security tools are bad for you.
;-)
Do you have the same problem when you use http instead?
yes
If not, or if you can simply use ftp without the
You were righ! I've DL the file at home without a problem.
Thanks for the hint
Security tools considered harmful Posted Feb 16, 2006 11:42 UTC (Thu) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link] It's a nice example of how the word 'virus' is being bleached of any useful meaning, too. I can't see *any* definition of 'virus' which would include john (or libcrack, say); they're not malware at all.
If 'virus' equals 'security tool', then antivirus products are viruses! :)
Security tools considered harmful Posted Feb 16, 2006 13:13 UTC (Thu) by The_Flatlander (guest, #19245) [Link] >> I can't see *any* definition of 'virus' which would include john (or libcrack, say); they're not malware at all. <<
I agree with you, but it is possible that a copy of of John could turn a small security lapse into a large one quite rapidly, so other than your sysadmins, you probably don't want anyone else having a copy of that. Moreover, if the anti-virus tool were scanning the stream, rather than just blocking the site, it seems quite likely, (to the point of certainty), that some actual trojans or other malware programs contain some of the same routines. (It isn't a great leap to figure that malware writers might have mis-appropriated such code to their own nefarious purposes.)
The Flatlander
Security tools considered harmful Posted Feb 16, 2006 23:33 UTC (Thu) by xorbe (subscriber, #3165) [Link] And we all know that someone that knows how to download JohnTR and compile it and use it successfully, will be completely stumped by a proxy filter...
Security tools considered harmful Posted Feb 18, 2006 19:39 UTC (Sat) by erwbgy (subscriber, #4104) [Link] Indeed. Adding a few question marks on to the end of the URL often foolsthem.
|
|||||||||||||