Not logged in
Log in now
Create an account
Subscribe to LWN
An "enum" for Python 3
An unexpected perf feature
LWN.net Weekly Edition for May 16, 2013
A look at the PyPy 2.0 release
PostgreSQL 9.3 beta: Federated databases and more
The suspend kernel won't be big enough IMHO that contiguous memory will be
hard to get -- come on, we can implement it in less than 16k (4 pages)
Posted Feb 9, 2006 16:52 UTC (Thu) by bronson (subscriber, #4806)
But the minute you add SCSI, USB, FireWire, SATA, network filesystems, that code balloons out of control. That's not even counting LVM and partitioning issues. And, if the kernel has been running a long time, even 16K of contiguous memory becomes nontrivial to find.
So, yes, 16K is theoretically possible. But would it be useful? I doubt it.
Posted Feb 9, 2006 17:53 UTC (Thu) by jzbiciak (✭ supporter ✭, #5246)
Posted Feb 9, 2006 21:31 UTC (Thu) by bronson (subscriber, #4806)
Posted Feb 9, 2006 21:37 UTC (Thu) by jzbiciak (✭ supporter ✭, #5246)
I imagine suspend-to-network would be greated with the same enthusiasm as swap-to-network. :-)
suspend to network storage
Posted Feb 9, 2006 22:21 UTC (Thu) by pspinler (subscriber, #2922)
Is it worthless ? Hmm, maybe, but, what if you could restore the image to a different piece of (identical) hardware elsewhere ?
Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds