| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Van Jacobson's network channels -- Microkernel?Van Jacobson's network channels -- Microkernel?Posted Feb 1, 2006 20:48 UTC (Wed) by JoeBuck (subscriber, #2330)In reply to: Van Jacobson's network channels -- Microkernel? by NAR Parent article: Van Jacobson's network channels It's not really so surprising. The cost being avoided in both cases is context switching. The default way of doing things is that the lower-level processing is in the kernel and the higher-level processing is in userspace. Either moving almost everything into the kernel, or moving almost everything out, reduces the overhead.
(Log in to post comments)
Van Jacobson's network channels -- Microkernel? Posted Feb 2, 2006 2:13 UTC (Thu) by jwb (guest, #15467) [Link] In this case, the advantage is also that protocol processing is being done 1) in parallel, on an SMP machine; and 2) in the same cache space as the interested user process.
Van Jacobson's network channels -- Microkernel? Posted Feb 2, 2006 4:05 UTC (Thu) by atai (subscriber, #10977) [Link] So the Hurd still has hope for speed?
HURD fast? Posted Feb 2, 2006 5:36 UTC (Thu) by xoddam (subscriber, #2322) [Link] Not with Linux evolving at this rate :-)
|
|
||||||||||||